Category Archives: Applied Sciences homework help

Select a human service organization/agency that serves the community you profile

Select a human service organization/agency that serves the community you profiled in earlier assignments. Then, develop a written critique of the agency to address the following:
Describe the organization and its fit within the community.
Include the organization’s mission statement.
Explain the services provided through this organization.
Identify the primary populations served by the organization
Determine if the organization is culturally competent. Be specific in your explanation and provide examples as necessary. 
Drawing on theories of human behavior and the social environment, describe characteristics of the organization that impact its ability to engage its clients.
Explain the technology this organization uses to serve its clients. 
Support your assignment with at least three scholarly resources. In addition to these specified resources, other appropriate scholarly resources, including seminal articles, may be included.
Length: 5-7 pages, not including title and reference pages

– Watch the video “What’s the Difference Between Information Governance and Data

– Watch the video “What’s the Difference Between Information Governance and Data Governance” at
– please view “Data Governance Vs. Information Governance”, a seminar by a consulting firm from July 2021
Listen to the new video, read this 2021 whitepaper IFHIMA_IG_OCT2021.pdfns from the International Federation of Health Information Management Associations ( (Links to an external site.)), and seek other sources if you wish to answer the following questions:
1.What are the drivers (needs, reasons for) of information governance (IG) and data governance (DG)? 
2.  How do the differences between these drivers frame the different purposes and functions between information governance and DG?
3. Are information governance and DG the same thing, at odds with each other, or complementary? Explain and defend your answer.
4. What are possible synergies between information governance and DG?
Each question is worth 25 points.
All assignments are to be prepared as if they are being submitted in the performance of a management position including references to support your answers.

Field Experience Teachers have different views and philosophies about classroom

Field Experience
Teachers have different views and philosophies about classroom management, and how to introduce expectations, routines, and procedures to students. Views and philosophies on classroom management will continue to develop with experience.
Allocate at least 5 hours in the field to support this field experience.
Observe your mentor teacher during a lesson. While observing, take notes on how the teacher incorporates classroom management, student expectations, and procedures in the classroom.
After your observation, collaborate with your mentor teacher about classroom management and student behavioral expectations. Since you aren’t in a classroom setting  Youtube, TeacherTube, Teaching Channel, ASCD, Edutopia, The Teacher’s Network, Progress Center (SPED) and PBS are all great online resources that post many videos that could be watched in lieu of time in the physical placement. 
Your discussion should include the following:
The teacher’s classroom management philosophy, including theories or research the philosophy incorporates.
How expectations, routines, and procedures are introduced and reinforced in the classroom.
How the classroom expectations and procedures match the teacher’s philosophy.
How the teacher deals with and handles behavioral issues in the classroom.
How the classroom is physically set-up.
Ask additional and follow up questions as appropriate.
Use any remaining field experience hours to assist the mentor teacher in providing instruction and support to the class. 
At the conclusion of the field experience, write a 250-350 word summary reflecting on your experience. Describe how you will apply what you have learned to your future professional practice. Would you do anything differently? Why or why not? What remaining questions or concerns do you have with regard to a classroom management plan?
APA format is not required, but solid academic writing is expected.
This assignment uses a rubric. Review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

Establishing classroom procedures and implementing routines in the classroom hel

Establishing classroom procedures and implementing routines in the classroom help to manage the classroom and optimize time for instruction and efficient learning. Classroom procedures and routines should change depending on the needs of the class. Setting the expectations of the classroom is critical and must align with school/district philosophy.
Part 1: Classroom Expectations, Procedures, and Rules
For this assignment, create an 8 slide digital presentation to share classroom expectations, procedures, and rules (entering the classroom, using the restrooms, talking to others in the classroom, respect, responsibility, etc.) with students in your future classroom on the first day of school.
Include the following in your digital presentation:
Describe expectations of students’ in-class behaviors.
Develop 4-5 rules for your future classroom.
Define 4-5 procedures that will create a productive, positive classroom environment.
Explain how you will introduce, teach, and implement expectations, procedures, and rules.
Discuss the consequences if the rules are not followed.
Part 2: Technology
Describe three types of technology that will be used to help manage and enhance student engagement and classroom management, and what students will be taught  about the responsible use of each form of technology.
Title slide, reference slide, and presenter’s notes.
Support your findings with a minimum of three scholarly resources.

Complete a case study of a family that you are familiar with (not your own famil

Complete a case study of a family that you are familiar with (not your own family). It would be best to conceptualize using at least 3 of the various theories we have covered in class.   In addition, you should discuss specific interventions and techniques that you would use with this family and mention the duration of therapy and prognosis. What would be your role as a therapist? The case study should be at least 3 pages in length in content (plus a cover page and reference page). In addition to the 3-page paper, you must attach the family’s Genogram and Minuchin’s structural mapping of the family. See this site for examples Genogram Timeline Snapshots – Genogram Analytics  Be sure to look at the symbols tab on both maps
So, the minimum number of pages with cover page, content, references, and maps is 7 pages.

Based on what you’ve learned in this module, answer the questions below in a two

Based on what you’ve learned in this module, answer the questions below in a two-page, double-space written paper, and explain your answers:
With the presence of eSports rising in popularity, what steps do you think would need to be taken in order for them to be considered a proper sport by the vast majority of people? What would help them gain acceptance at events such as the Olympics? Also, what can be done to tackle the lack of professionalism that is present in eSports today?
Review the rubric below to see how you will be graded.

For this Critical Thinking assignment, you will apply counting techniques to rea

For this Critical Thinking assignment, you will apply counting techniques to real-world scenarios.
A random password generator is a computer program, hardware device, or online tool used to generate passwords using a set of parameters like length, letters, numbers, symbols, and strength (Nicholas, 2016).
Suppose that you want to create a password of four characters in length that can only include lower case letters and numbers from 0 to 9.
Part I: Answer the following questions:
Assuming repetitions are allowed, how many passwords are possible?
Assuming repetitions are not allowed, how many passwords are possible?
Assuming repetitions are not allowed and there must be exactly two numbers, how many passwords are possible?
Assuming repetitions are not allowed and there must be exactly two numbers, located at the end of the password, how many passwords are possible?
Assuming repetitions are not allowed, there must be exactly two numbers, located at the end of the password, and that the letters can only be vowels, how many passwords are possible?
Part II: Based on your work in Part I, discuss the following:
Explain your thought process to answer questions one through five in Part I. Identify which counting technique you used to answer each question.
Could you have used any other counting technique to answer question one, Part I? Justify your answer.
Could you have used any other counting technique to answer question two, Part I? Justify your answer.
Compare your answers to questions one and two in Part I. Elaborate on what happens when repetitions are allowed versus not allowed.
Compare your answers to questions three and four in Part I. Elaborate on what happens when you restrict the location of the two numbers.
Explain how you can use a tree diagram to answer question five, Part I. Do not actually include the tree diagram.
Compare your answers to questions one through five in Part I. Reflect about the security of passwords as more restrictions are added.
Think of another scenario where you can apply counting techniques. Discuss the advantages of knowing how to use counting techniques in the context of the scenario you created.
Nicholas, M. (2016). How do random password generators work? (Links to an external site.) Dashlane. (Links to an external site.)
You must submit two files for this assignment. The first file should contain the computations, graphs, diagrams, etc., associated with the questions in Part I. This file may be formatted as a numbered list of answers. Unless stated in the problem, a narrative discussion is not required, but you must provide enough information to show how you arrived at the answer.
The second file should be a 2-3-page narrative paper, written in APA format, associated with the situation described in Part II. Specific requirements for the paper are provided below:
Your paper should be 2-3 pages in length (not counting the title page and references page) and should cite and integrate at least two credible outside sources. The CSU Global Library is a great place to find resources. Your textbook is a credible resource.
Include a title page, introduction, body, conclusion, and a reference page.
The introduction should describe or summarize the topic or problem. It might discuss the general applications of the topic or it might introduce the unique terminology associated with the topic.
The body of your paper should address the questions posed in the problem. Explain how you approached and answered the question or solved the problem, and, for each question, show all steps involved. Be sure this is in paragraph format, not numbered answers like a homework assignment.
The conclusion should summarize your thoughts about what you have determined from your analysis in completing the assignment. Nothing new should be introduced in the conclusion that was not previously discussed in the body paragraphs.
Include any tables of data or calculations, calculated values, and/or graphs referenced in the paper. (Note: The minimum required length excludes any tables, graphs, etc.)
Document formatting, citations, and style should conform to the CSU Global Writing Center (Links to an external site.). A short summary containing much that you need to know about paper formatting, citations, and references is contained in the Template Paper (Links to an external site.). If you need assistance with your writing style or you need writing tips or tutorials, visit the CSU Global Writing Center.

Consequences impact future frequencies of behavior. As noted by Aubrey Daniels,

Consequences impact future frequencies of behavior. As noted by Aubrey Daniels, he suggests that consequences have relative power. In other words, he states that immediate consequences are more powerful than future consequences. Please classify the following regarding as how they should function as a reinforcer and discuss if you think if consequences can be altered to be more effective: 
Pay every two weeks. 
Employee evaluation conducted by a principal or clinical director. 
Holiday parties. 
Verbal praise statements for completing data collection. 

LINK After watching the video


After watching the video above, and reading the chapter materials, please define the stakeholders in health care.
Considering the video and the information from the chapters, what kind of health care reform do you think would work in the United States and why? If you don’t think we need reform please explain very clearly as to why.

Students may pick any epidemiological article to practice on the following quest

Students may pick any epidemiological article to practice on the following questions
1. Research objective and study rationale
a. What is the primary research objective of this study?
b. What is the rationale for this objective (i.e., the reason(s) that this objective is important to achieve)?
c. In terms of public health importance and contribution to knowledge, how strong is the rationale for this study and how well is it presented by the authors (e.g., conceptual framework, supporting evidence, logic)?
d. How well grounded is the rationale in the published literature (biological, epidemiological)? 
2. Key variables, measures, and data collection modes
a. What are the key variables and what are their roles (e.g., primary outcome [“disease”] or dependent variables, “exposure” or study factors, major potential confounders and other covariables)?
b. How are these variables defined and measured?
c. What are the major modes by which data are being collected? (e.g., self-administered questionnaire, interviewer-administered questionnaire, medical record review, biological specimens, etc.)
d. How suited are these variables, their definitions, their measurement methods, and the data collection modes for the objectives and rationale of this study? Would other ones have been better for meeting the objectives? If yes, which variables and/or methods and why? 
3. Study conduct and quality control
a. How has the study population been recruited (e.g., patients in a clinic, volunteers to advertisements, random digit dialing, area sampling of households, etc.)? If different groups of participants are recruited through different mechanisms (e.g., cases and controls, exposed and unexposed), provide this information for each primary group).
b. What steps were taken to minimize non-participation and selective factors in recruitment? In retention? How effective were these steps?
c. How successful, overall, was the data collection? What major steps were taken to improve and
document the accuracy of the data collected? 
4. Study design and study population
a. Identify the important design features of the study, such as its basic design, or architecture (e.g., case-control, cohort, etc.) and how the design is implemented (e.g., incident vs. prevalent cases, randomization by group, whether data are collected multiple times, what follow-up or any is involved, how follow-up if any is carried out, etc.])
b. Compared to other reasonable choices, what are the advantages and disadvantages of this study design and its features for the specific objective(s) or question(s) of this study?
c. What is the study population for this investigation?
d. What are the major eligibility criteria (inclusion and/or exclusion criteria)?
e. How suited is this choice of study population, including eligibility criteria, for the objectives of the study? 
5. Data analysis
a. What are the primary data analysis strategies and/or methods used in the study (e.g., stratified analysis, mathematical modeling, graphical analysis)?
b. How are the primary variables coded for analysis? (e.g., as binary or dichotomous variables, in categories, as ordered categories, as counts, as continuous measures?)
c. What were the primary statistical parameters (measures) estimated in the data analysis (e.g., means, prevalences, incidences, incidence rate ratios, odds ratios, survival curves)?
d. How well suited is the choice of these parameters to the objectives of the study? Are there other parameters that you think should have been estimated?
e. How many participants are included in the primary analyses, and what percentage do they
constitute of the people who were eligible and selected for inclusion? Have a substantial number of observations been dropped from the analyses? Do drop-outs pose any limitations to the final conclusion?
f. How well do the authors deal with issues of multi-causation (e.g., measurement of and control for potentially confounding variables, investigation of important interactions)? Do the authors analyze the data separately in respect to a major variable to assess similarity or differences? 
6. Findings
a. What are the main findings, including both those related to the primary study question(s) and other important results?
b. Are there particular results you regard as most important?
c. How well have the authors reported and presented their findings?
d. Are there additional results or analyses that you believe should have been reported, data that should have been shown?
e. Are extraneous results presented? 
7. Potential concerns in interpreting the findings
a. How completely do the authors account for the disposition of all prospective members of the study population (e.g., persons sampled but not contacted, refusals, exclusions from analysis, etc.)
b. Does the study population seem to reflect the target population well? What sources of selection bias, if any, are likely to be a problem?
c. What are the major possible sources of bias and other threats to validity that are important for interpreting the findings?
d. How well did the authors discuss these threats to validity? Did the authors present them objectively, evaluate their likely importance, and provide evidence in support of that evaluation? Did the authors conduct any specific analyses to evaluate reliability, validity, selection bias, social desirability, or information bias? What were the results of these analyses? 
8. Conclusions, implications, and recommendations
ff. What are the primary conclusions? Are they stated clearly?
a. How well are they supported by the findings and discussion?
b. How directly do the conclusions relate to the primary study objective and rationale?
c. How well did the authors address implications of their study and/or give insightful recommendations for next steps. 
9. Overview of strengths and limitations
a. What were the key strengths of this study in regard to its objective and accomplishments?
b. Has the study taken advantage of new methodology?
c. Do these strengths or new methodology advance the field? How?
d. What were the key limitations of this study in regard to its objective(s) and
e. Are these limitations shared by other studies of this topic?
f. What would be needed to overcome these limitations? 
10. Linkage with previous knowledge
a. How well did the authors compare their results to the findings from other relevant studies?
How well did the authors discuss reasons for differences between previous findings and their own?
b. How well did the authors evaluate the evidence concerning the study objective or question in regard to possible biological or other mechanisms that could account for their findings and other criteria for causal inference (for this question, please ignore concerns about bias)?
c. How relevant and responsive to the study rationale was this discussion?
d. In what ways, if any, have the authors advanced previous knowledge?